← Natchitoches Heritage & Community Preservation
Folklife & Fieldwork · Natchitoches collection · Project 01

The Natchitoches Preservation Network

In 2008, a local experiment in social media became a shared public workspace for preservation groups, heritage researchers, community members, and the places they cared about.

FoundedApril 2008
ApproachGroups, discussions, public media, shared research
Preservation statusOriginal Ning export and associated media under review
Archival screenshot of the original Natchitoches Preservation Network website
Recovered web interface / Primary digital artifact

The original network, preserved.

The early site brought community groups, local research, project discussions, films and photographs into a shared digital workspace. This screenshot is evidence of the site’s presentation, while the surviving Ning export provides a more extensive record of its activity.

Follow the surviving media →
People and public practice

The network was made by its participants.

These surviving documentary records point toward the people and encounters behind the website. They are examples of NPN-era media and connected work—not proof that everyone pictured was an NPN member.

Original video thumbnails are used as pointers to the records. Identification, contributor credits, and production context belong with each source.

The network today · October 2026

Returning to its original home on Ning

The Natchitoches Preservation Network is being revived at its original address, natchitochespreservation.ning.com. The intention is to recover the network as a community-facing space, rather than treat its surviving articles, conversations, and media solely as artifacts of a discontinued platform.

This return is still a restoration effort: historical records have been recovered and republished, but public access to the Ning site and the completeness of individual archives have not yet been independently verified. An original entry, a recovered export, a video file, and a working public page are not interchangeable forms of evidence.

Here on Voices of the Past, this project page serves a complementary purpose: explaining why the network mattered, mapping its work and contributors, documenting recovery and provenance, and connecting related collections. The original network is the intended home for its restored community record.

Visit the original Natchitoches Preservation Network →

The project

A network for the people doing heritage

I founded Natchitoches Preservation Network (NPN) in April 2008, as an online meeting place for people working on history, folklore, public archaeology and preservation in the Cane River region. It wasn’t a single organization’s official website: the model invited community organizations and individuals to publish their own updates, exchange questions, organize projects, and share photographs, films and audio.

In a contemporary retrospective, Guin described the goal as supporting people involved in the doing of heritage preservation. A 2010 column reported around 800 photographs and 27 videos on the network at the time. These are historical, self-reported site figures, not a current count of playable or individually preserved media.

A project-led record

The work that happened inside the network

This Place Matters

In the 2008 year-in-review, NPN reported filming representatives at 14 local sites. The seven original playlist entries plus separately indexed uploads are only part of the historical production story.

Open the media catalog →

Beneath the Bricks

A public archaeology effort on Front Street, interpreted through community collaboration, a working group, and youth heritage education.

Read the original account →

Kisatchie School documentation

The NPN group made room for former students, community organizers, and Heritage Resources researchers to coordinate preservation documentation.

Explore Kisatchie School →

PIYC and research-in-public

Coverage and media connected the research of NCPTT interns and partners to public audiences through the recurring Preservation in Your Community event.

Explore PIYC →

Folk Festival & cultural knowledge

Recorded traditional storytelling, folk skills, oral histories, and cultural research; original films require individual attribution and recovery.

See documented recordings →

Community preservation conversations

The original site carried member groups, project discussions, preservation questions, partner announcements, and contributed photos—evidence of relationships, not simply content to republish.

How it worked

The early social-web system

Ning groups and project spacesMember pages and topic-specific working groups supported communication among preservation advocates, students, researchers and interested residents.
Video, audio and photographyOriginal documentaries sat alongside third-party contributions and externally embedded records. Producer, participant, and uploader credits must be kept separate.
Distributed feeds and discoveryContemporary reporting described YouTube, Facebook, RSS, Twitter, FriendFeed and social bookmarking used to make research easier to find.

The recovered Ning export currently contains 27 original video records and 141 blog records; additional group, forum and image records survive in the export. A record is not automatically a distinct film or a currently playable video.

Editorial challenge

What is recoverable, and what needs interpretation?

Key distinction: We are reconstructing how the network worked and what it enabled, not presenting every item ever posted there as a film produced by Guin. Some historical embeds are unavailable; some source files exist without a verified public release. User-generated contributions carry their own credits and permissions.

Priority work: verify public accessibility and completeness of the revived Ning site, reconcile the recovered export with published posts and both YouTube channels, reconnect original media and discussion threads, preserve original authorship and dates, trace community outcomes without overstating them, and invite original participants to correct the record.

In the same collection

Follow the connected work

A living record, not an institutional claim. Original contributors retain attribution. Historic publication dates, production dates, archival deposits, and present accessibility are separate facts. Research and recovery are ongoing.