- You have an instant social network with a lot of the functionality of Facebook and your own brand
- It’s customizable with colors, graphics and typefaces
- There are a variety of privacy options for the site and for individual users
- Feature set is continually improved.
- Ability to track your web statistics through Google Analytics
- Unless your potential membership is highly prolific and motivated, you will have to manage your community intensively to keep the participation level up.
- Once the information is in Ning, you can’t readily export it to another platform (like a blog).
- There are hundreds of social sites out there and many folks are fatigued with signing up for them.
- While Ning is improving, there will still be some instances (like getting a photo to show up in a post) where a rudimentary knowledge of HTML code is helpful.
- It’s also your responsibility to deal with spambots and members behaving badly.
Natchitoches Preservation Network (collaborative small town heritage site)
Natchitoches, La., the first permanent settlement in the Louisiana Purchase territory, is home to more than 30 organizations dealing with heritage issues. These organizations have long worked together to preserve the town’s historic legacy. While each has had its own website (often several years out of date) and publicity methods, the duplicate efforts wasted the energy of these organizations. Ning was used to create the Natchitoches Preservation Network site. The 151-member site uses groups and blogs to keep the community apprised of various heritage events and informs them of ongoing research and volunteer opportunities. Blog posts include anything from Community Cemetery Cleaning Day to thesis project presentations by Heritage Resources Students at nearby Northwestern State University of Louisiana. The site also makes use of RSS and embedding of other social media to enhance the experience. It includes a virtual library of links from the social bookmarking service Delicious. It also incorporates a Friendfeed group that allows members to add news stories related to Natchitoches heritage from other sites, embedding them on the front page. Members post photos and videos about events and places around the parish including the a series of “This Place Matters” videos in which individuals explain the importance of their favorite landmarks around the parish. The site was also used to communicate intern research hosted at the National Center for Preservation Technology an Training during the summer. The interns blogged to the Natchitoches community weekly about the progress with their projects and how the projects benefit them as a community. They then presented their research at the end of the summer during the event “Preservation in Your Community.” Heritage is more than just ensuring that a place matters, some heritage individuals find their passion preserving more intangible aspects, such as the art of music. GenealogyWise (Genealogy Research)Genealogy is one of humankind’s favorite hobbies. We all want to know what makes us “us.” Not surprisingly, there are numerous genealogy networks on Ning. GenealogyWise is one of the largest. With more than 14,000 members and 3,000 groups, it’s very active. Using its group function, it also includes an interesting method for people to connect: by surname. The groups also tackle specific topics such as dating photos and outdoor genealogy. Nearly 400 videos (many of which are how-tos) have been posted. And to help the large membership connect, the site also holds scheduled live chats.
Museum 3.0 (Discussions on museums in the digital age)
Museum 3.0 poses the question, “What will the museum of the future be like?” More than 1,600 people from all over the world have joined in seeking an answer to this question. The forums serve as their discussion board for a variety of topics including the future of the audio tour, new virtual tours on different sites, Twitter as a business tool and museum-related surveys. Museum 3.o also uses the events function of Ning to promote different conferences, seminars and networking opportunities. Museum 3.0 also uses Ning’s video and image sharing opportunities to post more than 500 images from different museums and about 50 videos ranging from interviews to museum-related speeches to videos depicting the “Reel Texas Cowboys.” But heritage is not something that needs to be simply left to professionals. With social networking sites like Ning, heritage values are now in the hands of the individual. For some, Ning enables them to research their family heritage and unit individuals globally giving them one centralized place to share aspects of their lives. The families use their Ning sites to post family photos and videos, discuss family reunions and also research their family trees. Regardless of the heritage you find important, let it be community heritage or your own family’s history, Ning enables you to share it all globally with folks who share those same values at the click of a button. The sites we’ve covered are only a sampling of what’s out there. We’d love to hear your thoughts on your favorite heritage-focused Ning sites.Project Catalog Card
View the community-platform experiment & what it revealed about digital heritage infrastructure
| Project / example | Natchitoches Preservation Network on Ning |
|---|---|
| Period | Late 2000s |
| Problem | How could a local heritage community connect organizations, residents, researchers, volunteers, and people outside formal institutions in one shared online space? |
| Practice | Used a hosted social-network platform with groups, blogs, member profiles, RSS, shared links, photos, video, and community announcements. |
| What happened | The network grew to more than 150 members and became a shared channel for events, research updates, volunteer activity, and place-based interpretation. |
| What became obsolete | The free Ning model, several integrated Web 2.0 services, and much of the original platform environment. |
| What remains | The need for focused communities to have identity, discussion space, member-to-member connection, shared resources, and durable ways to preserve what they create. |
| Trajectory | Hosted social network → community knowledge infrastructure → later concerns about platform dependence, portability, and institutional memory. |
| Status | Historical platform experiment; surviving screenshots, links, and descriptions preserved here. |
Supporting Documents & Surviving Sources
View the surviving platform record & examples referenced in the original post
- Archived Natchitoches Preservation Network.
- The working YouTube embed at the top of this page is retained as part of the original record.
- Surviving Flickr-linked screenshots throughout the article document the Ning interface and several heritage-network examples from the period.
Archive Note / Provenance
View what changed, what I underestimated & why the platform-dependence lesson matters now
Ning itself survived, but the model described here changed quickly. In 2010 the company ended its free-network offering and shifted toward paid community hosting. The Natchitoches Preservation Network and other examples in this post belong to a short-lived moment when organizations could build their own branded social networks with very little money or technical infrastructure.
What I saw correctly: focused communities often need more than a broadcast channel. They need identity, discussion space, member-to-member connection, shared resources, and reasons to return.
What I underestimated: the most important warning in the original post was buried in the “Cons” list: once the information was inside Ning, it was difficult to move elsewhere. That was not a minor technical inconvenience; it was the core institutional risk. Community, content, and memory had been built inside a platform the organization did not control.
What I would say now: before creating a community on any external platform, decide what must remain portable—member data, posts, files, metadata, relationships, URLs, moderation records, and institutional memory—and know how you will export or preserve it. The platform may be temporary even when the community is not.
The larger idea—creating focused online communities outside the major social platforms—continues to reappear. The more durable lesson is that community architecture and preservation architecture should be designed together.
Critical Questions + Add to the Record
- What happens when useful tools become systems we depend on?
- How do we preserve memory when the systems carrying it keep changing?
- Who gets to speak, and whose knowledge is heard?
Application here: the Natchitoches Preservation Network shows both sides of platform infrastructure: a hosted tool can make community participation possible very quickly, but it can also concentrate the community’s knowledge inside a system the community does not control.
Were you a member of the Natchitoches Preservation Network or another heritage Ning community? Add screenshots, memories, exported material, corrections, or examples of what survived after the platform changed.
Discover more from Voices of the Past
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





I agree. Ning is an excellent service, which is why I use it.
Unfortunately, on 16 April Ning announced that they would be withdrawing their free service entirely. The changeover is set to begin on May 4.
I think that we are likely to see many of the Ning sites migrating to other platforms at this time!
You can read more about Ning’s decision on their blog: http://blog.ning.com/2010/04/an-update-from-ning.html
Hi,
The illustration you have given are quiet helpful. Ning has been my blogging network for last 8 months and I am so happy with it. Now with even more features and enhancements I can make my own heritage-themed social network. Thanks Ning.
Essay Help